Dental Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Dental, including details on implants, health, hygiene, cosmetic, dentistry.

Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter.

Li Q, Wang YN

Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, China.

The purpose of this study was to compare the applicability of two shade-matching approaches: Vintage Halo shade guide (visual method) and Shofu ShadeEye NCC colorimeter (instrumental method). Twenty participants' maxillary left central incisors were evaluated. Corresponding metal ceramic crowns were fabricated with each shade-matching approach. The colour distributions (L*, a* and b*) of the middle third region of each tooth and corresponding metal ceramic crowns were spectrophotometrically assessed. The colour difference (DeltaE) and colour distributions (DeltaL*, Deltaa* and Deltab*) between the tooth and the corresponding crowns were calculated. We found that the colour differences of both groups fell within the clinical unacceptable range (DeltaE > 2.75). Regarding DeltaE and the three colour distributions, no significant difference was found, expect for a* (P < 0.01). The shade matching difficulty degree was analysed through the agreements of visual shade selection. Within easy matching cases, the instrumental method achieved better results (P = 0.041). In conclusion, it is suggested that the reliability of shade matching can be ensured by neither the colorimeter nor the visual approach. However, the colorimeter can achieve better results within easy matching cases.

Published 8 October 2007 in J Oral Rehabil, 34(11): 848-54.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2004-2008 Dental Research Today. All Rights Reserved.