Dental Research - Implants, Health, Hygiene, Cosmetic, Dentistry

Dental Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Dental, including details on implants, health, hygiene, cosmetic, dentistry.


Dental Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Dental

Books on Dental

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies.

Dunham D, Brudvik JS, Morris WJ, Plummer KD, Cameron SM

Prosthodontic Department, Ft. Bragg, NC, USA.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically. MATERIAL AND METHODS: New and existing frameworks with at least 1 conventional prepared occlusal rest were evaluated for fit. The spacing between the bottom of each of the rests of the 50 clasp assemblies and the corresponding rest seat were recorded with vinyl polysiloxane. The fit of each rest was determined with the use of a dial caliper by measuring, in micrometers, the thickness of the record between the rest and the bottom of the rest seat. The Kennedy classification was also recorded. A 2-sample t test was used to evaluate the difference in fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported designs (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The average space between the rest and prepared rest seat was 193 +/- 203 microm, with a range of 0 to 828 mum. Twenty tooth-tissue frameworks had an average space of 136 +/- 160 microm and 30 tooth-supported frameworks had an average space of 230 +/- 222 microm. The 2-sample t test showed no significant difference for fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported frameworks (P=.1081). Twenty-four percent of rests had contact in the prepared rest seat. CONCLUSION: The majority of rests evaluated did not contact the intended surfaces.

Published 17 April 2006 in J Prosthet Dent, 95(4): 323-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Dental Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Dental Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Dental Books

Accidentally Dead

Accidentally Dead